You can even assign keyboard shortcuts to your macros. This file is opened each time Word starts up. If you want to have this macro available for use in any open document, make sure to save the macro in the Normal.dotm file. From the View tab in MS Word (20), in the Macros group click the Record Macro button. I think the easiest way for you to handle this is to record some macros. The same kind of thing can be done with the paragraph-after spacing I've also tossed in a couple more you might like to play with, for adjusting However, as it seems you may be doing this to manage the page composition, perhaps there's a valid reason in this case.īelow are some macros to adjust both the line spacing and paragraph-before spacing, by 0.5pt increments.
![how to reduce spacing between lines in word 2016 how to reduce spacing between lines in word 2016](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xu6xS8yjDMA/mqdefault.jpg)
Outlook 2013 looks just plain ugly – but I suppose that’s in the eye of the beholder, and a topic for a different forum.As a general rule, changes to paragraph attributes should be done by changing the underlying Styles, not be direct formatting.
![how to reduce spacing between lines in word 2016 how to reduce spacing between lines in word 2016](https://tipsmake.com/data/images/adjust-line-spacing-in-word-instructions-on-how-to-adjust-line-spacing-in-word-2007-2010-2013-2016-picture-5-ZJNCxAwKr.png)
All these problems (lack of simple and easy visual configuration options) are probably tied to concessions required for running Outlook on Tablets with their grossly poor pointing device resolution – ie: fat fingers – but it’s really too bad so many previously available configuration options and visual queues have apparently been eliminated. It’s really a pain, since working with an expanded (or even partially expanded) Folder list – I now have to scroll several pages to locate a particular folder. Third – yes, putting the system in Tablet mode makes the situation even WORSE, but even in smaller spaced Mouse mode, spacing is still much larger than my previous version of Outlook. So back to the basic question - Is there some way to reduce the pixel spacing? Secondly, as the thread notes – spacing between lines is quite wide (may be even worse on 2016 – as above poster seemed happy with 2013, which is much wider than 2010 / 2007). But I sure haven’t found a way to make it smaller (which as Joe indicates might also serve to proportionally reduce line spacing).
#How to reduce spacing between lines in word 2016 windows 10
Maybe it’s buried in a registry setting somewhere, or maybe it’s just using some font from another Windows 10 setting.
![how to reduce spacing between lines in word 2016 how to reduce spacing between lines in word 2016](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/courses-images/wp-content/uploads/sites/1844/2017/05/04215723/linespacing1.png)
First, I could find no way to change the Folder List font size. It appears (at least in Outlook 2013) there are two problems. Just upgraded from Outlook 2010 to 2013 and spent hours attempting to “fix” this issue, without success. New to forum, so hope not to have missed something. So, changing the font size changes the spacing. I don’t suppose you ever worked out if there was a way to change this, did you? I’ve found exactly the same problem – upgraded from Outlook 2013 to 2016 and the only noticeable difference so far is that I get fewer folders on the screen in the folder view, which is annoying! My initial thought was that I had the touch setting enabled, but that just makes the problem worse!ĭid you read the thread? The line spacing is proportional to the font size. The Kludge of changing the font size is not really the right way to fix it – especially on my small laptop with 2560 x 1400 screen where a small font size soon becomes unreasonable It’s obvious that MS have done something with 2016 which is not fixable by us mortals. Both had the same sized fonts but I could see more folders on the 2013 one. The difference in spacing was really obvious. I had Outlook 2016 on one screen and Outlook 2013 on the other – both are desktops running at 1920 x 1200. Its not the font size that’s the issue, but the spacing between the lists of folders.